Featured
Table of Contents
Both propose to eliminate the capability to "online forum shop" by omitting a debtor's place of incorporation from the place analysis, andalarming to international debtorsexcluding money or cash equivalents from the "principal possessions" equation. Furthermore, any equity interest in an affiliate will be deemed located in the very same place as the principal.
Typically, this testimony has been concentrated on questionable 3rd celebration release arrangements implemented in current mass tort cases such as Purdue Pharma, Kid Scouts of America, and many Catholic diocese bankruptcies. These arrangements frequently require creditors to release non-debtor 3rd parties as part of the debtor's plan of reorganization, even though such releases are probably not permitted, at least in some circuits, by the Insolvency Code.
In effort to mark out this behavior, the proposed legislation claims to restrict "forum shopping" by restricting entities from filing in any location except where their home office or principal physical assetsexcluding money and equity interestsare located. Seemingly, these bills would promote the filing of Chapter 11 cases in other United States districts, and steer cases far from the preferred courts in New York, Delaware and Texas.
In spite of their laudable function, these proposed modifications might have unanticipated and possibly unfavorable effects when seen from a global restructuring potential. While congressional testament and other analysts presume that venue reform would simply guarantee that domestic business would file in a different jurisdiction within the United States, it is a distinct possibility that international debtors may hand down the US Bankruptcy Courts completely.
Without the consideration of cash accounts as an opportunity towards eligibility, numerous foreign corporations without concrete possessions in the United States might not qualify to submit a Chapter 11 insolvency in any United States jurisdiction. Second, even if they do qualify, international debtors might not have the ability to count on access to the normal and hassle-free reorganization friendly jurisdictions.
Given the complicated concerns regularly at play in a global restructuring case, this might trigger the debtor and creditors some unpredictability. This unpredictability, in turn, might encourage international debtors to submit in their own countries, or in other more useful countries, instead. Significantly, this proposed venue reform comes at a time when many countries are replicating the US and revamping their own restructuring laws.
In a departure from their previous restructuring system which emphasized liquidation, the new Code's goal is to restructure and preserve the entity as a going issue. Therefore, debt restructuring agreements might be approved with as little as 30 percent approval from the overall debt. Unlike the US, Italy's new Code will not include an automated stay of enforcement actions by creditors.
In February of 2021, a Canadian court extended the nation's approval of 3rd party release provisions. In Canada, organizations generally reorganize under the conventional insolvency statutes of the Companies' Creditors Plan Act (). 3rd party releases under the CCAAwhile fiercely objected to in the USare a common element of restructuring strategies.
The recent court decision makes clear, though, that in spite of the CBCA's more minimal nature, 3rd celebration release provisions may still be appropriate. Therefore, companies might still avail themselves of a less cumbersome restructuring available under the CBCA, while still receiving the advantages of third party releases. Efficient since January 1, 2021, the Dutch Act Upon Court Verification of Extrajudicial Restructuring Plans has created a debtor-in-possession treatment conducted outside of formal bankruptcy procedures.
Reliable as of January 1, 2021, Germany's new Act on the Stabilization and Restructuring Structure for Businesses attends to pre-insolvency restructuring proceedings. Prior to its enactment, German companies had no choice to reorganize their financial obligations through the courts. Now, distressed business can call upon German courts to restructure their financial obligations and otherwise preserve the going concern worth of their service by utilizing many of the exact same tools available in the US, such as maintaining control of their company, imposing pack down restructuring strategies, and executing collection moratoriums.
Motivated by Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code, this brand-new structure simplifies the debtor-in-possession restructuring procedure largely in effort to help little and medium sized businesses. While prior law was long criticized as too pricey and too complicated due to the fact that of its "one size fits all" approach, this brand-new legislation incorporates the debtor in ownership model, and offers a streamlined liquidation process when necessary In June 2020, the United Kingdom enacted the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act of 2020 ().
Notably, CIGA supplies for a collection moratorium, invalidates certain arrangements of pre-insolvency contracts, and allows entities to propose an arrangement with investors and lenders, all of which permits the formation of a cram-down plan comparable to what may be achieved under Chapter 11 of the US Personal Bankruptcy Code. In 2017, Singapore adopted enacted the Companies (Amendment) Act 2017 (Singapore), that made major legal changes to the restructuring arrangements of the Singapore Companies Act (Cap 50) 2006.
As an outcome, the law has actually significantly improved the restructuring tools available in Singapore courts and propelled Singapore as a leading hub for insolvency in the Asia-Pacific. In Might of 2016, India enacted the Insolvency and Personal Bankruptcy Code, which totally upgraded the bankruptcy laws in India. This legislation looks for to incentivize additional investment in the country by supplying higher certainty and effectiveness to the restructuring process.
Given these recent changes, international debtors now have more choices than ever. Even without the proposed restrictions on eligibility, foreign entities might less require to flock to the US as in the past. Further, must the United States' venue laws be changed to avoid easy filings in specific practical and advantageous locations, worldwide debtors might start to consider other areas.
Special thanks to Dallas associate Michael Berthiaume who prepared and authored this material under the guidance of Rebecca Winthrop, Of Counsel in our Los Angeles office.
Customer insolvency filings increased 9% in January 2026 compared to January 2025, with 44,282 customer filings that month alone. Commercial filings jumped 49% year-over-year the greatest January level since 2018. The numbers reflect what debt professionals call "slow-burn financial strain" that's been developing for many years. If you're having a hard time, you're not an outlier.
How to Apply for Chapter 7 in 2026Consumer personal bankruptcy filings amounted to 44,282 in January 2026, up 9% from January 2025. Commercial filings struck 1,378 a 49% year-over-year jump and the highest January industrial filing level given that 2018. For all of 2025, consumer filings grew almost 14%.
Latest Posts
Shielding Your Assets From Creditor Harassment
Latest Government Debt Relief Options for 2026
Coping With Difficult Debt Collectors in 2026


